The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) intends to challenge a court decision from July regarding its lawsuit against Ripple’s Labs. The court had previously determined that the sale of XRP at $0.62 to retail investors is not considered security.
In a letter dated August 9th, addressed to Judge Analisa Torres, who presides over the case, the SEC expressed its belief that her decision deserves scrutiny from an appellate court.
Judge Torres was requested to suspend the case during the appeal, highlighting the potential impact on multiple pending court cases. A legal dispute between the SEC and various crypto entities, including Binance and Coinbase, involves alleged securities violations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has requested an interlocutory review for the current case, expressing the need for a review while the case is still pending. The SEC cites two crucial legal issues that warrant attention due to potential differences of opinion and an emerging intra-district split.
The SEC has expressed its intention to affirm the court’s ruling that the sale of Ripple’s programmatic XRP, both on crypto exchanges and through individual sales, did not involve securities.
The judge’s ruling against Terraform Labs, which rejected Torres’ decision, was also emphasized by the SEC. According to their suit, cryptocurrencies traded on exchanges could potentially be classified as securities.
Ripple’s Partial Victory
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a letter nearly a month after Ripple’s partial victory. This victory was in their dispute over classifying XRP as securities with the SEC.
Torres, a legal authority, determined that the XRP token does not qualify as a security. However, she highlighted that the sale of XRP tokens may be deemed securities under specific circumstances. This includes sales to institutional investors but excludes sales on exchange to retail traders.
This distinction proved to be crucial for Ripple. It allowed the company to avoid SEC regulation on most of its XRP sales. Ripple contended that, unlike securities, XRP served as a digital asset with utility beyond mere price appreciation.
The SEC claimed Ripple sold unregistered securities, alleging involvement from 2013. Ripple contested the accusation. Moreover, they alleged that the company had raised more than $1.3 billion through its XRP sales. The SEC also accused Ripple’s executives of personally benefiting from these sales.
The crypto industry has been closely monitoring this case, as it holds potential implications for other digital assets falling within the SEC’s jurisdiction. The appeal’s outcome can either strengthen or weaken Ripple’s position and establish a precedent for future cryptocurrency-related cases.
Related Reading | Tether Launches New Software To Improve Mining Performance
“The author’s views are for reference only and shall not constitute any investment advice. Please ensure you fully understand and assess the products and associated risks before purchasing.”
Comments (No)